Semantic Analysis Workflow: The Fedora Example

How can a previously manual workflow be automated with AI and other components? I use our Fed Beige Book analysis agent called Fedora as a case study to show the new automated workflow in GPT. No human need to be involved in the process any more, except for the occasional quality control.

Just like the workflow is automated, the workflow graph generation is also automated using Mermaid v11.

%%{init: {'themeVariables': { 'fontFamily': 'Arial'}}}%% flowchart TD A["`**New Beige Book Release**`"]:::blue subgraph S1["`*1. Ingestion*`"] B["`**Fetch Beige Book**
HTML / PDF`"]:::base C["`**Store Source & Metadata**`"]:::base end subgraph S2["`*2. Extraction*`"] D["`**Parse District Sections**`"]:::base E["`**Extract First Sentences**`"]:::base F["`**Extract Full District Text**`"]:::base end subgraph S3["`*3. Scoring*`"] G["`**Apply Growth LUT**
First Sentence`"]:::base H["`**Apply Semantic LUT**
Full Text`"]:::base I["`**Generate District Scores**`"]:::base end subgraph S4["`*4. Aggregation*`"] J["`**Apply GDP Weights
from Workbook**`"]:::base K["`**Compute Metrics: Weighted Mean, DI, WDI**`"]:::base L["`**Compute Semantic Indices**`"]:::base M["`**Compute Composite Macro Index**`"]:::base end subgraph S5["`⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀*5. Output*`"] N["`**Write to Workbook**
Main, Semantic, History`"]:::base O["`**Generate Tellusant Summary**`"]:::base P["`**Generate Charts (Python)**`"]:::base Q["`**Store Audit Trail**`"]:::base end subgraph S6["`*0. Automation*`"] R["`**Scheduled Trigger**
GitHub Actions`"]:::base S["`**Check for New Release**`"]:::base end subgraph S7["`⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀*6. Feedback Loop*`"] T["`**Human Review**`"]:::green U["`**Update in Workbook**`"]:::base end V["`**Final Output**`"]:::red R --> S --> A A --> B --> C --> D --> E D --> F E --> G --> I F --> H --> I I --> J --> K I --> L --> M K --> N M --> N N --> O N --> P N --> Q O --> T P --> T Q --> T -->|⠀if error⠀| U --> G T -->|⠀if correct⠀| V O --> V linkStyle 24 stroke:blue,stroke-width:1; linkStyle 26 stroke:transparent,stroke-width:0; %% ========= STYLES ========= classDef green fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#1B5E20,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef blue fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#0D47A1,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef orange fill:#FFF8E1,stroke:#FF6F00,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef red fill:#FDECEA,stroke:#B71C1C,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef grey fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#424242,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef base fill:#ECECFF,stroke:#9370DB,stroke-width:2px,color:#111; classDef clear fill:transparent,stroke:transparent;

The details of the workflow is best understand by studying the graph.

Instead, what is interesting is whether the GPT generated workflow corresponds to my own cognitive process. It does exactley, with two additions.

I suppose I could get a job at GPT as an agent.

My conclusion is that GPT mimics the cognitive paths of a logical person. If this was all, it would be an effiency tool only.

But it also expands on the tasks. It does what a person cannot do. Not because it is an innovation, but because it has more capacity.

How long before it innovates for real? I estimate in 2-3 years.